Advertisement
civil war strategies of the north and south: The Grand Design Donald Stoker, 2010-07-20 Despite the abundance of books on the Civil War, not one has focused exclusively on what was in fact the determining factor in the outcome of the conflict: differences in Union and Southern strategy. In The Grand Design, Donald Stoker provides for the first time a comprehensive and often surprising account of strategy as it evolved between Fort Sumter and Appomattox. Reminding us that strategy is different from tactics (battlefield deployments) and operations (campaigns conducted in pursuit of a strategy), Stoker examines how Abraham Lincoln and Jefferson Davis identified their political goals and worked with their generals to craft the military means to achieve them--or how they often failed to do so. Stoker shows that Davis, despite a West Point education and experience as Secretary of War, ultimately failed as a strategist by losing control of the political side of the war. Lincoln, in contrast, evolved a clear strategic vision, but he failed for years to make his generals implement it. And while Robert E. Lee was unerring in his ability to determine the Union's strategic heart--its center of gravity--he proved mistaken in his assessment of how to destroy it. Historians have often argued that the North's advantages in population and industry ensured certain victory. In The Grand Design, Stoker reasserts the centrality of the overarching plan on each side, arguing convincingly that it was strategy that determined the result of America's great national conflict. |
civil war strategies of the north and south: Civil War Supply and Strategy Earl J. Hess, 2020-10-07 Winner of the Colonel Richard W. Ulbrich Memorial Book Award Winner of the Army Historical Foundation Distinguished Writing Award Civil War Supply and Strategy stands as a sweeping examination of the decisive link between the distribution of provisions to soldiers and the strategic movement of armies during the Civil War. Award-winning historian Earl J. Hess reveals how that dynamic served as the key to success, especially for the Union army as it undertook bold offensives striking far behind Confederate lines. How generals and their subordinates organized military resources to provide food for both men and animals under their command, he argues, proved essential to Union victory. The Union army developed a powerful logistical capability that enabled it to penetrate deep into Confederate territory and exert control over select regions of the South. Logistics and supply empowered Union offensive strategy but limited it as well; heavily dependent on supply lines, road systems, preexisting railroad lines, and natural waterways, Union strategy worked far better in the more developed Upper South. Union commanders encountered unique problems in the Deep South, where needed infrastructure was more scarce. While the Mississippi River allowed Northern armies to access the region along a narrow corridor and capture key cities and towns along its banks, the dearth of rail lines nearly stymied William T. Sherman’s advance to Atlanta. In other parts of the Deep South, the Union army relied on massive strategic raids to destroy resources and propel its military might into the heart of the Confederacy. As Hess’s study shows, from the perspective of maintaining food supply and moving armies, there existed two main theaters of operation, north and south, that proved just as important as the three conventional eastern, western, and Trans-Mississippi theaters. Indeed, the conflict in the Upper South proved so different from that in the Deep South that the ability of Federal officials to negotiate the logistical complications associated with army mobility played a crucial role in determining the outcome of the war. |
civil war strategies of the north and south: How the North Won Herman Hattaway, Archer Jones, 1991 Covers the essential factors which shaped the battles and ultimately determined the outcome of the Civil War. |
civil war strategies of the north and south: Why the Confederacy Lost Gabor S. Boritt, 1992 Five major historians return to the battlefield to explain the South's defeat. Provocatively argued and engagingly written, this work rejects the notion that the Union victory was inevitable and shows the importance of the commanders, strategies, and victories at key moments. |
civil war strategies of the north and south: Confederate Tide Rising Joseph L. Harsh, 1998 This analysis of the military policy and strategy adopted by Robert E. Lee and Jefferson Davis in the first two years of the Civil War, argues that their policies allowed the Confederacy to survive longer than it otherwise could have and were the policies best designed to win Southern independence. |
civil war strategies of the north and south: The Gettysburg Address Abraham Lincoln, 2022-11-29 The complete text of one of the most important speeches in American history, delivered by President Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War. On November 19, 1863, Abraham Lincoln arrived at the battlefield near Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, to remember not only the grim bloodshed that had just occurred there, but also to remember the American ideals that were being put to the ultimate test by the Civil War. A rousing appeal to the nation’s better angels, The Gettysburg Address remains an inspiring vision of the United States as a country “conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.” |
civil war strategies of the north and south: What Caused the Civil War?: Reflections on the South and Southern History Edward L. Ayers, 2006-08-17 “An extremely good writer, [Ayers] is well worth reading . . . on the South and Southern history.”—Stephen Sears, Boston Globe The Southern past has proven to be fertile ground for great works of history. Peculiarities of tragic proportions—a system of slavery flourishing in a land of freedom, secession and Civil War tearing at a federal Union, deep poverty persisting in a nation of fast-paced development—have fed the imaginations of some of our most accomplished historians. Foremost in their ranks today is Edward L. Ayers, author of the award-winning and ongoing study of the Civil War in the heart of America, the Valley of the Shadow Project. In wide-ranging essays on the Civil War, the New South, and the twentieth-century South, Ayers turns over the rich soil of Southern life to explore the sources of the nation's and his own history. The title essay, original here, distills his vast research and offers a fresh perspective on the nation's central historical event. |
civil war strategies of the north and south: Attack and Die Grady McWhiney, Perry D. Jamieson, 1982 Why did the Confederacy lose so many men? The authors contend that the Confederates bled themselves nearly to death in the first three years of the war by making costly attacks more often than the Federals. Offensive tactics, which had been used successfully by Americans in the Mexican War, were much less effective in the 1860s because an improved weapon - the rifle - had given increased strength to defenders. This book describes tactical theory in the 1850s and suggests how each related to Civil War tactics. It also considers the development of tactics in all three arms of the service during the Civil War. |
civil war strategies of the north and south: Such Troops as These Bevin Alexander, 2015-09-01 Acclaimed military historian Bevin Alexander offers a provocative analysis of Stonewall Jackson’s military genius and reveals how the Civil War might have ended differently if Jackson’s strategies had been adopted. The Civil War pitted the industrial North against the agricultural South, and remains one of the most catastrophic conflicts in American history. With triple the population and eleven times the industry, the Union had a decided advantage over the Confederacy. But one general had a vision that could win the War for the South—Thomas J. “Stonewall” Jackson. Jackson believed invading the eastern states from Baltimore to Maine could divide and cripple the Union, forcing surrender, but failed to convince Confederate president Jefferson Davis or General Robert E. Lee. In Such Troops as These, Bevin Alexander presents a compelling case for Jackson as the greatest general in American history. Fiercely dedicated to the cause of Southern independence, Jackson would not live to see the end of the War. But his military legacy lives on and finds fitting tribute in this book. |
civil war strategies of the north and south: Ways and Means Roger Lowenstein, 2022-03-08 “Captivating . . . [Lowenstein] makes what subsequently occurred at Treasury and on Wall Street during the early 1860s seem as enthralling as what transpired on the battlefield or at the White House.” —Harold Holzer, Wall Street Journal “Ways and Means, an account of the Union’s financial policies, examines a subject long overshadowed by military narratives . . . Lowenstein is a lucid stylist, able to explain financial matters to readers who lack specialized knowledge.” —Eric Foner, New York Times Book Review From renowned journalist and master storyteller Roger Lowenstein, a revelatory financial investigation into how Lincoln and his administration used the funding of the Civil War as the catalyst to centralize the government and accomplish the most far-reaching reform in the country’s history Upon his election to the presidency, Abraham Lincoln inherited a country in crisis. Even before the Confederacy’s secession, the United States Treasury had run out of money. The government had no authority to raise taxes, no federal bank, no currency. But amid unprecedented troubles Lincoln saw opportunity—the chance to legislate in the centralizing spirit of the “more perfect union” that had first drawn him to politics. With Lincoln at the helm, the United States would now govern “for” its people: it would enact laws, establish a currency, raise armies, underwrite transportation and higher education, assist farmers, and impose taxes for them. Lincoln believed this agenda would foster the economic opportunity he had always sought for upwardly striving Americans, and which he would seek in particular for enslaved Black Americans. Salmon Chase, Lincoln’s vanquished rival and his new secretary of the Treasury, waged war on the financial front, levying taxes and marketing bonds while desperately battling to contain wartime inflation. And while the Union and Rebel armies fought increasingly savage battles, the Republican-led Congress enacted a blizzard of legislation that made the government, for the first time, a powerful presence in the lives of ordinary Americans. The impact was revolutionary. The activist 37th Congress legislated for homesteads and a transcontinental railroad and involved the federal government in education, agriculture, and eventually immigration policy. It established a progressive income tax and created the greenback—paper money. While the Union became self-sustaining, the South plunged into financial free fall, having failed to leverage its cotton wealth to finance the war. Founded in a crucible of anticentralism, the Confederacy was trapped in a static (and slave-based) agrarian economy without federal taxing power or other means of government financing, save for its overworked printing presses. This led to an epic collapse. Though Confederate troops continued to hold their own, the North’s financial advantage over the South, where citizens increasingly went hungry, proved decisive; the war was won as much (or more) in the respective treasuries as on the battlefields. Roger Lowenstein reveals the largely untold story of how Lincoln used the urgency of the Civil War to transform a union of states into a nation. Through a financial lens, he explores how this second American revolution, led by Lincoln, his cabinet, and a Congress studded with towering statesmen, changed the direction of the country and established a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. |
civil war strategies of the north and south: Confederate Reckoning Stephanie McCurry, 2012-05-07 Pulitzer Prize Finalist Winner of the Frederick Douglass Book Prize Winner of the Merle Curti Award “McCurry strips the Confederacy of myth and romance to reveal its doomed essence. Dedicated to the proposition that men were not created equal, the Confederacy had to fight a two-front war. Not only against Union armies, but also slaves and poor white women who rose in revolt across the South. Richly detailed and lucidly told, Confederate Reckoning is a fresh, bold take on the Civil War that every student of the conflict should read.” —Tony Horwitz, author of Confederates in the Attic “McCurry challenges us to expand our definition of politics to encompass not simply government but the entire public sphere. The struggle for Southern independence, she shows, opened the door for the mobilization of two groups previously outside the political nation—white women of the nonslaveholding class and slaves...Confederate Reckoning offers a powerful new paradigm for understanding events on the Confederate home front.” —Eric Foner, The Nation “Perhaps the highest praise one can offer McCurry’s work is to say that once we look through her eyes, it will become almost impossible to believe that we ever saw or thought otherwise...At the outset of the book, McCurry insists that she is not going to ask or answer the timeworn question of why the South lost the Civil War. Yet in her vivid and richly textured portrait of what she calls the Confederacy’s ‘undoing,’ she has in fact accomplished exactly that.” —Drew Gilpin Faust, New Republic “A brilliant, eye-opening account of how Southern white women and black slaves fatally undermined the Confederacy from within.” —Edward Bonekemper, Civil War News The story of the Confederate States of America, the proslavery, antidemocratic nation created by white Southern slaveholders to protect their property, has been told many times in heroic and martial narratives. Now, however, Stephanie McCurry tells a very different tale of the Confederate experience. When the grandiosity of Southerners’ national ambitions met the harsh realities of wartime crises, unintended consequences ensued. Although Southern statesmen and generals had built the most powerful slave regime in the Western world, they had excluded the majority of their own people—white women and slaves—and thereby sowed the seeds of their demise. Wartime scarcity of food, labor, and soldiers tested the Confederate vision at every point and created domestic crises to match those found on the battlefields. Women and slaves became critical political actors as they contested government enlistment and tax and welfare policies, and struggled for their freedom. The attempt to repress a majority of its own population backfired on the Confederate States of America as the disenfranchised demanded to be counted and considered in the great struggle over slavery, emancipation, democracy, and nationhood. That Confederate struggle played out in a highly charged international arena. The political project of the Confederacy was tried by its own people and failed. The government was forced to become accountable to women and slaves, provoking an astounding transformation of the slaveholders’ state. Confederate Reckoning is the startling story of this epic political battle in which women and slaves helped to decide the fate of the Confederacy and the outcome of the Civil War. |
civil war strategies of the north and south: The Vicksburg Campaign Christopher Richard Gabel, 2013 The Vicksburg Campaign, November 1862-July 1863 continues the series of campaign brochures commemorating our national sacrifices during the American Civil War. Author Christopher R. Gabel examines the operations for the control of Vicksburg, Mississippi. President Abraham Lincoln called Vicksburg the key, and indeed it was as control of the Mississippi River depended entirely on the taking of this Confederate stronghold. |
civil war strategies of the north and south: Why the South Lost the Civil War , 1991-09-01 Offers a chronological account of the Civil War, reexamines theories for the South's defeat, and analyzes Confederate and Union military strategy |
civil war strategies of the north and south: How the South Could Have Won the Civil War Bevin Alexander, 2008-11-25 Could the South have won the Civil War? To many, the very question seems absurd. After all, the Confederacy had only a third of the population and one-eleventh of the industry of the North. Wasn’t the South’s defeat inevitable? Not at all, as acclaimed military historian Bevin Alexander reveals in this provocative and counterintuitive new look at the Civil War. In fact, the South most definitely could have won the war, and Alexander documents exactly how a Confederate victory could have come about—and how close it came to happening. Moving beyond fanciful theoretical conjectures to explore actual plans that Confederate generals proposed and the tactics ultimately adopted in the war’s key battles, How the South Could Have Won the Civil War offers surprising analysis on topics such as: •How the Confederacy had its greatest chance to win the war just three months into the fighting—but blew it •How the Confederacy’s three most important leaders—President Jefferson Davis and Generals Robert E. Lee and Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson—clashed over how to fight the war •How the Civil War’s decisive turning point came in a battle that the Rebel army never needed to fight •How the Confederate army devised—but never fully exploited—a way to negate the Union’s huge advantages in manpower and weaponry •How Abraham Lincoln and other Northern leaders understood the Union’s true vulnerability better than the Confederacy’s top leaders did •How it is a myth that the Union army’s accidental discovery of Lee’s order of battle doomed the South’s 1862 Maryland campaign •How the South failed to heed the important lessons of its 1863 victory at Chancellorsville How the South Could Have Won the Civil War shows why there is nothing inevitable about military victory, even for a state with overwhelming strength. Alexander provides a startling account of how a relatively small number of tactical and strategic mistakes cost the South the war—and changed the course of history. |
civil war strategies of the north and south: Strategies of North and South Gerald L. Earley, 2021-06-30 Since the Antebellum days there has been a tendency to view the South as martially superior to the North. In the years leading up to the Civil War, Southern elites viewed Confederate soldiers as gallant cavaliers, their Northern enemies as mere brutish inductees. An effort to give an unbiased appraisal, this book investigates the validity of this perception, examining the reasoning behind the belief in Southern military supremacy, why the South expected to win, and offering an cultural comparison of the antebellum North and South. The author evaluates command leadership, battle efficiency, variables affecting the outcomes of battles and campaigns, and which side faced the more difficult path to victory and demonstrated superior strategy. |
civil war strategies of the north and south: Punitive War Clay Mountcastle, 2009 This book examines the guerilla experience and then traces its progresion from the Western Theater in 1861 to its apogee in the East in the last two years of the war.--Pg. 5. |
civil war strategies of the north and south: Meade at Gettysburg Kent Masterson Brown, Esq., 2021-05-03 Although he took command of the Army of the Potomac only three days before the first shots were fired at Gettysburg, Union general George G. Meade guided his forces to victory in the Civil War's most pivotal battle. Commentators often dismiss Meade when discussing the great leaders of the Civil War. But in this long-anticipated book, Kent Masterson Brown draws on an expansive archive to reappraise Meade's leadership during the Battle of Gettysburg. Using Meade's published and unpublished papers alongside diaries, letters, and memoirs of fellow officers and enlisted men, Brown highlights how Meade's rapid advance of the army to Gettysburg on July 1, his tactical control and coordination of the army in the desperate fighting on July 2, and his determination to hold his positions on July 3 insured victory. Brown argues that supply deficiencies, brought about by the army's unexpected need to advance to Gettysburg, were crippling. In spite of that, Meade pursued Lee's retreating army rapidly, and his decision not to blindly attack Lee's formidable defenses near Williamsport on July 13 was entirely correct in spite of subsequent harsh criticism. Combining compelling narrative with incisive analysis, this finely rendered work of military history deepens our understanding of the Army of the Potomac as well as the machinations of the Gettysburg Campaign, restoring Meade to his rightful place in the Gettysburg narrative. |
civil war strategies of the north and south: Braxton Bragg Earl J. Hess, 2016-09-02 As a leading Confederate general, Braxton Bragg (1817–1876) earned a reputation for incompetence, for wantonly shooting his own soldiers, and for losing battles. This public image established him not only as a scapegoat for the South's military failures but also as the chief whipping boy of the Confederacy. The strongly negative opinions of Bragg's contemporaries have continued to color assessments of the general's military career and character by generations of historians. Rather than take these assessments at face value, Earl J. Hess's biography offers a much more balanced account of Bragg, the man and the officer. While Hess analyzes Bragg's many campaigns and battles, he also emphasizes how his contemporaries viewed his successes and failures and how these reactions affected Bragg both personally and professionally. The testimony and opinions of other members of the Confederate army--including Bragg's superiors, his fellow generals, and his subordinates--reveal how the general became a symbol for the larger military failures that undid the Confederacy. By connecting the general's personal life to his military career, Hess positions Bragg as a figure saddled with unwarranted infamy and humanizes him as a flawed yet misunderstood figure in Civil War history. |
civil war strategies of the north and south: Household War Lisa Tendrich Frank, LeeAnn Whites, 2020 Household War is a collection of essays that explores the Civil War through the household. According to the editors, the household served as 'the basic building block for American politics, economics, and social relations.' As such, the scholars of this volume make the case that the Civil War can be understood as a revolutionary moment in the transformation of the household order. From this vantage point, they look at the interplay of family and politics, studying the ways in which the Civil War shaped and was shaped by the American household. The volume offers a unique approach to the study of the Civil War that allows an inclusive examination of how the war 'flowed from, required, and . . . resulted in the restructuring of the household' between regions and those enslaved and free. This volume seeks to address how households redefined and reordered themselves as a result of the changes stemming from the Civil War. Scholars of this volume provide compelling histories of the myriad ways in which the household played a central role during an era of social upheaval and transformation-- |
civil war strategies of the north and south: The Vicksburg Campaign Ulysses S. Grant, 2015-11-20 In the 19th century, one of the surest ways to rise to prominence in American society was to be a war hero, like Andrew Jackson and William Henry Harrison. But few would have predicted such a destiny for Hiram Ulysses Grant, who had been a career soldier with little experience in combat and a failed businessman when the Civil War broke out in 1861. However, while all eyes were fixed on the Eastern theater at places like Manassas, Richmond, the Shenandoah Valley and Antietam, Grant went about a steady rise up the ranks through a series of successes in the West. His victory at Fort Donelson, in which his terms to the doomed Confederate garrison earned him the nickname Unconditional Surrender Grant, could be considered the first major Union victory of the war, and Grant's fame and rank only grew after that at battlefields like Shiloh and Vicksburg. Along the way, Grant nearly fell prey to military politics and the belief that he was at fault for the near defeat at Shiloh, but President Lincoln famously defended him, remarking, I can't spare this man. He fights. Lincoln's steadfastness ensured that Grant's victories out West continued to pile up, and after Vicksburg and Chattanooga, Grant had effectively ensured Union control of the states of Kentucky and Tennessee, as well as the entire Mississippi River. At the beginning of 1864, Lincoln put him in charge of all federal armies, and he led the Army of the Potomac against Robert E. Lee in the Overland campaign, the siege of Petersburg, and famously, the surrender of the Army of Northern Virginia at Appomattox. Although Grant was instrumental in winning the war and eventually parlayed his fame into two terms in the White House, his legacy and accomplishments are still the subjects of heavy debate today. His presidency is remembered mostly due to rampant fraud within his Administration, although he was never personally accused of wrongdoing, and even his victories in the Civil War have been countered by charges that he was a butcher. Like the other American Legends, much of Grant's personal life has been eclipsed by the momentous battles and events in which he participated, from Fort Donelson to the White House. |
civil war strategies of the north and south: Ruin Nation Megan Kate Nelson, 2012 During the Civil War, cities, houses, forests, and soldiers' bodies were transformed into “dead heaps of ruins,” novel sights in the southern landscape. How did this happen, and why? And what did Americans—northern and southern, black and white, male and female—make of this proliferation of ruins? Ruin Nation is the first book to bring together environmental and cultural histories to consider the evocative power of ruination as an imagined state, an act of destruction, and a process of change. Megan Kate Nelson examines the narratives and images that Americans produced as they confronted the war's destructiveness. Architectural ruins—cities and houses—dominated the stories that soldiers and civilians told about the “savage” behavior of men and the invasions of domestic privacy. The ruins of living things—trees and bodies—also provoked discussion and debate. People who witnessed forests and men being blown apart were plagued by anxieties about the impact of wartime technologies on nature and on individual identities. The obliteration of cities, houses, trees, and men was a shared experience. Nelson shows that this is one of the ironies of the war's ruination—in a time of the most extreme national divisiveness people found common ground as they considered the war's costs. And yet, very few of these ruins still exist, suggesting that the destructive practices that dominated the experiences of Americans during the Civil War have been erased from our national consciousness. |
civil war strategies of the north and south: Mama's Nightingale Edwidge Danticat, 2015-09-01 A touching tale of parent-child separation and immigration, from a National Book Award finalist After Saya's mother is sent to an immigration detention center, Saya finds comfort in listening to her mother's warm greeting on their answering machine. To ease the distance between them while she’s in jail, Mama begins sending Saya bedtime stories inspired by Haitian folklore on cassette tape. Moved by her mother's tales and her father's attempts to reunite their family, Saya writes a story of her own—one that just might bring her mother home for good. With stirring illustrations, this tender tale shows the human side of immigration and imprisonment—and shows how every child has the power to make a difference. |
civil war strategies of the north and south: The Southern Strategy David K. Wilson, 2008 A reexamination of major Southern battles and tactics in the American War of Independence A finalist for the 2005 Distinguished Writing Award of the Army Historical Foundation and the 2005 Thomas Fleming Book Award of the American Revolution Round Table of Philadelphia, The Southern Strategy shifts the traditional vantage point of the American Revolution from the Northern colonies to the South in this study of the critical period from 1775 to the spring of 1780. David K. Wilson suggests that the paradox of the British defeat in 1781--after Crown armies had crushed all organized resistance in South Carolina and Georgia--makes sense only if one understands the fundamental flaws in what modern historians label Britain's Southern Strategy. In his assessment he closely examines battles and skirmishes to construct a comprehensive military history of the Revolution in the South through May 1780. A cartographer and student of battlefield geography, Wilson includes detailed, original battle maps and orders of battle for each engagement. Appraising the strategy and tactics of the most significant conflicts, he tests the thesis that the British could raise the manpower they needed to win in the South by tapping a vast reservoir of Southern Loyalists and finds their policy flawed in both conception and execution. |
civil war strategies of the north and south: Richmond Must Fall Hampton Newsome, 2013 In the fall of 1864, the Civil War's outcome rested largely on Abraham Lincoln's success in the upcoming residential election. As the contest approached, cautious optimism buoyed the President's supporters in the wake of Union victories at Atlanta and in the Shenandoah Valley. With all eyes on the upcoming election, Robert E. Lee and Ulysses S. Grant conducted a series of large-scale military operations outside Richmond and Petersburg, whichhave, until now, received little attention. Drawing on an array of original sources, Newsome focuses on the October battles themselves, examining the plans for the operations, the decisions made by commanders on the battlefield, and the soldiers' view from the ground. At the same time, he places these military actions in the larger political context of the fall of 1864. With the election looming, neither side could afford a defeat at Richmond or Petersburg. Nevertheless, Grant and Lee were willing to take significant risks to seek great advantage. These military events set the groundwork for operations that would close the war in Virginia several months later. |
civil war strategies of the north and south: A Prussian Observes the American Civil War Justus Scheibert, 2001 |
civil war strategies of the north and south: The Illustrated Battle Cry of Freedom James M. McPherson, 2003-12-11 Filled with fresh interpretations and information, puncturing old myths and challenging new ones, Battle Cry of Freedom will unquestionably become the standard one-volume history of the Civil War. James McPherson's fast-paced narrative fully integrates the political, social, and military events that crowded the two decades from the outbreak of one war in Mexico to the ending of another at Appomattox. Packed with drama and analytical insight, the book vividly recounts the momentous episodes that preceded the Civil War--the Dred Scott decision, the Lincoln-Douglas debates, John Brown's raid on Harper's Ferry--and then moves into a masterful chronicle of the war itself--the battles, the strategic maneuvering on both sides, the politics, and the personalities. Particularly notable are McPherson's new views on such matters as the slavery expansion issue in the 1850s, the origins of the Republican Party, the causes of secession, internal dissent and anti-war opposition in the North and the South, and the reasons for the Union's victory. The book's title refers to the sentiments that informed both the Northern and Southern views of the conflict: the South seceded in the name of that freedom of self-determination and self-government for which their fathers had fought in 1776, while the North stood fast in defense of the Union founded by those fathers as the bulwark of American liberty. Eventually, the North had to grapple with the underlying cause of the war--slavery--and adopt a policy of emancipation as a second war aim. This new birth of freedom, as Lincoln called it, constitutes the proudest legacy of America's bloodiest conflict. This authoritative volume makes sense of that vast and confusing second American Revolution we call the Civil War, a war that transformed a nation and expanded our heritage of liberty. |
civil war strategies of the north and south: Blue and Gray Diplomacy Howard Jones, 2010-01-01 In this examination of Union and Confederate foreign relations during the Civil War from both European and American perspectives, Howard Jones demonstrates that the consequences of the conflict between North and South reached far beyond American soil. Jones explores a number of themes, including the international economic and political dimensions of the war, the North's attempts to block the South from winning foreign recognition as a nation, Napoleon III's meddling in the war and his attempt to restore French power in the New World, and the inability of Europeans to understand the interrelated nature of slavery and union, resulting in their tendency to interpret the war as a senseless struggle between a South too large and populous to have its independence denied and a North too obstinate to give up on the preservation of the Union. Most of all, Jones explores the horrible nature of a war that attracted outside involvement as much as it repelled it. Written in a narrative style that relates the story as its participants saw it play out around them, Blue and Gray Diplomacy depicts the complex set of problems faced by policy makers from Richmond and Washington to London, Paris, and St. Petersburg. |
civil war strategies of the north and south: Lincoln's Spies Douglas Waller, 2020-08-18 This major addition to the history of the Civil War is a “fast-paced, fact-rich account” (The Wall Street Journal) offering a detailed look at President Abraham Lincoln’s use of clandestine services and the secret battles waged by Union spies and agents to save the nation—filled with espionage, sabotage, and intrigue. Veteran CIA correspondent Douglas Waller delivers a riveting account of the heroes and misfits who carried out a shadow war of espionage and covert operations behind the Confederate battlefields. Lincoln’s Spies follows four agents from the North—three men and one woman—who informed Lincoln’s generals on the enemy positions for crucial battles and busted up clandestine Rebel networks. Famed detective Allan Pinkerton mounted a successful covert operation to slip Lincoln through Baltimore before his inauguration after he learns of an assassination attempt from his agents working undercover as Confederate soldiers. But he proved less than competent as General George McClellan’s spymaster, delivering faulty intelligence reports that overestimated Confederate strength. George Sharpe, an erudite New York lawyer, succeeded Pinkerton as spymaster for the Union’s Army of the Potomac. Sharpe deployed secret agents throughout the South, planted misinformation with Robert E. Lee’s army, and outpaced anything the enemy could field. Elizabeth Van Lew, a Virginia heiress who hated slavery and disapproved of secession, was one of Sharpe’s most successful agents. She ran a Union spy ring in Richmond out of her mansion with dozens of agents feeding her military and political secrets that she funneled to General Ulysses S. Grant as his army closed in on the Confederate capital. Van Lew became one of the unsung heroes of history. Lafayette Baker was a handsome Union officer with a controversial past, whose agents clashed with Pinkerton’s operatives. He assembled a retinue of disreputable spies, thieves, and prostitutes to root out traitors in Washington, DC. But he failed at his most important mission: uncovering the threat to Lincoln from John Wilkes Booth and his gang. Behind these operatives was Abraham Lincoln, one of our greatest presidents, who was an avid consumer of intelligence and a ruthless aficionado of clandestine warfare, willing to take whatever chances necessary to win the war. Lincoln’s Spies is a “meticulous chronicle of all facets of Lincoln’s war effort” (Kirkus Reviews) and an excellent choice for those wanting “a cracking good tale” (Publishers Weekly) of espionage in the Civil War. |
civil war strategies of the north and south: 'Twixt North and South Harlan M. Calhoun, 1974 |
civil war strategies of the north and south: Lost Victories Bevin Alexander, 2004 While studies of the American Civil War generally credit Robert E Lee with military expertise, this account argues that Stonewall Jackson was superior strategist who could have won the war for the South: Had Lee accepted Jackson's plan for an invasion of the North, the South might have surprised and dismayed the Union forces into defeat. Using primary sources, the author reconstructs the battles that demonstrate Jackson's brilliance as a commander. |
civil war strategies of the north and south: Thunder on the River Daniel L. Schafer, 2010 This ... narrative explores the impact of the Civil War on Florida's St. John's River region. Moving chronologically through the war years, Thunder on the river brings to light the story of the city of Jacksonville, including the surrounding countryside and its residents, be they white or black, supporters of the Confederacy or of the Union ... Based on a thorough review of a broad selection of primary sources, Thunder on the river touches on such important themes as secession, contested places, occupation, emancipation, invasions, hard war, and reconstruction. It presents local history in a national context and offers a comprehensive telling of the story of Florida's Civil War experiences from the Missouri Compromise to Reconstruction -- of Confederates and Unionists, of soldiers and civilians, of enlisted men and officers, of die-hards and deserters, of slaves and plantation owners, of ordinary men and women caught up in extraordinary events--Jacket. |
civil war strategies of the north and south: Civil War Command And Strategy Jones Archer, 2010-05-11 In this comparative history of Union & Confederate command & strategy, Jones shows us how the Civil War was actually conducted. Looking at decision-making at the highest levels, Jones argues that President Lincoln & Davis & most of their senior generals brought to the context of the Civil War a broad grasp of established mil. strategy & its historical applications, as well as the ability to make significant strategic innovations. He emphasizes the role of maneuvers as well as the significance of battles, & demonstrates that the war was a multi-faceted blend of traditional warfare with early influences of the industrial age. |
civil war strategies of the north and south: Grant & Lee John Frederick Charles Fuller, 1957 |
civil war strategies of the north and south: Fort Pillow Massacre United States Congress Joint Committee, 2018-11-10 This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. To ensure a quality reading experience, this work has been proofread and republished using a format that seamlessly blends the original graphical elements with text in an easy-to-read typeface. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant. |
civil war strategies of the north and south: Strategies of North and South Gerald L. Earley, 2021-07-14 Since the Antebellum days there has been a tendency to view the South as martially superior to the North. In the years leading up to the Civil War, Southern elites viewed Confederate soldiers as gallant cavaliers, their Northern enemies as mere brutish inductees. An effort to give an unbiased appraisal, this book investigates the validity of this perception, examining the reasoning behind the belief in Southern military supremacy, why the South expected to win, and offering an cultural comparison of the antebellum North and South. The author evaluates command leadership, battle efficiency, variables affecting the outcomes of battles and campaigns, and which side faced the more difficult path to victory and demonstrated superior strategy. |
civil war strategies of the north and south: , |
civil war strategies of the north and south: CliffsNotes AP U.S. History Cram Plan Melissa Young, 2018-10-09 CliffsNotes AP U.S. History Cram Plan gives you a study plan leading up to your AP exam no matter if you have two months, one month, or even one week left to review before the exam! This new edition of CliffsNotes AP U.S. History Cram Plan calendarizes a study plan for the 489,000 AP U.S. History test-takers depending on how much time they have left before they take the May exam. Features of this plan-to-ace-the-exam product include: • 2-months study calendar and 1-month study calendar • Diagnostic exam that helps test-takers pinpoint strengths and weaknesses • Subject reviews that include test tips and chapter-end quizzes • Full-length model practice exam with answers and explanations |
civil war strategies of the north and south: Attack and Die Grady McWhiney, Perry D. Jamieson, 1984-07-30 A Selection of the History Book Club. A controversial book that answers why the Confederates suffered such staggering human losses. -- History Book Club Review |
civil war strategies of the north and south: CliffsNotes CSET: Multiple Subjects with CD-ROM, 3rd Edition Stephen Fisher, Jerry Bobrow, 2012-04-03 A new edition of one of the bestselling CSET products on the market Reflects the latest changes in the California CSET Multiple Subjects teacher-certification test, which is now computer-based only The book includes diagnostic tests for every domain included in the test, detailed subject review chapters, and 2 full-length practice tests with in-depth answer explanations The CD contains all of the book's subject review chapters in searchable PDF format, the book's 2 practice tests, plus a third full-length practice test |
civil war strategies of the north and south: The Civil War Donna Reynolds, 2020-07-15 The Civil War still holds a prominent place in the American imagination. Reenactments and battlefield visits are popular tourist attractions for both Northerners and Southerners. The underlying issues of racism and states' rights that caused the war are also still visible in American society. Sidebars, timelines, and historic images augment the informative narrative. Detailed maps illustrate how the Civil War was fought. Annotated quotes and discussion questions help readers develop a deeper understanding of the reality of the American Civil War and draw comparisons between this historical period and modern times. |
NAVAL STRATEGY DURING THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR - DTIC
The conduct of the American Civil War, and the strategies involved, have been studied extensively. Volumes have been written on the subject. And although a ... shipments of meat from the North.7 Grain production within the South was adequate to meet their needs. The Mississippi Valley was the main importing region for grain, while the Atlantic ...
Christian Interpretations of the Civil War - JSTOR
war came from the studies and pulpits of preachers, perhaps es-pecially-but by no means only-during the actual fighting. Slavery and the constitutional issue as well as the assignment of war guilt gave content and shape to theological pronouncements North, South and neutral not only in the war generation but as late as the day be-fore yesterday.
Strategies Of North And South In Civil War (book)
Strategies Of North And South In Civil War Strategies of North and South Gerald L. Earley,2021-06-30 Since the Antebellum days there has been a tendency to view the South as martially superior to the North In the years leading up to the Civil War Southern elites viewed Confederate
Strategies of the Civil War - cooperms.typepad.com
Strategies of the Civil War Instructions: Use the chart to answer the following questions. 1. Explain whether or not you believe the Union blockade of the South was successful. 2. Explain why the Union wanted to capture the Mississippi River. 3. Describe U.S. Grant’s and William T. Sherman’s plans for defeating the South.
Tracking the Economic Divergence of the North and the South
1940s and 1950s, a number of Civil War historians sought to downplay differ-ences between North and South by arguing that the war was repressible and tar-geting one group in particular for blame: the “blundering generation” of politi-cians holding office in the decades prior to the war. To these revisionists, political
Guided Reading & Analysis: The Civil War, 1861-1865 chapter 14- Civil War
The Civil War, map from wiki commons, and image from artshound) ... strategies, key victories, greater resources, and the wartime destruction of the South’s environment and infrastructure. ... Both the North and the South experienced inflation due to …
Writings on the American Civil War - Marxists Internet Archive
North American Civil War Karl Marx: The North American Civil War October, 1861 The Trent Case November, 1861 The Anglo-American Conflict ... In essence the extenuating arguments read: The war between the North and South is a tariff war. The war is, further, not for any principle, does not touch the question of slavery and in fact turns on ...
The Army and Reconstruction, 1865-1877 - U.S. Army Center of …
war remains our most contentious, and our bloodiest, with over six hundred thousand killed in the course of the four-year struggle. Most civil wars do not spring up overnight, and the American Civil War was no exception. The seeds of the conflict were sown in the earliest days of the republic’s founding, primarily over the
Strategies Of North And South In Civil War (Download Only)
Strategies Of North And South In Civil War Strategies of North and South Gerald L. Earley,2021-06-30 Since the Antebellum days there has been a tendency to view the South as martially superior to the North In the years leading up to the Civil War Southern elites viewed Confederate
This Mighty Scourge - Moodle USP: e-Disciplinas
Jefferson Davis and Confederate Strategies 51 5. The Saratoga That Wasn’t: The Impact of Antietam Abroad 65 6. To Conquer a Peace? ... Viscount Morley declared that the American Civil War had been “the only war in modern times as to which we can be sure, first, that no skill or patience of ... North & South Magazine ...
Strategies Of North And South In Civil War (2024)
Strategies Of North And South In Civil War Strategies of North and South Gerald L. Earley,2021-06-30 Since the Antebellum days there has been a tendency to view the South as martially superior to the North In the years leading up to the Civil War Southern elites viewed Confederate
Civil War in South Sudan: Is It a Reflection of Historical ...
ern and southern Sudan. 10 A full scale civil war commenced in 1955 and lasted until 1972 and then reignited in 1983 and lasted until 2005. The North South civil wars can properly be described as Africa s longest civil war. After the cessation of civil …
Civil War Tactics - JSTOR
Civil War Tactics Officers of both North and South were influenced by the practices of Wellington and Napoleon as regards weapons, logistics, and combat operations, but grand strategy was more dependent upon other factors Jac Weiler and F. W. Foster Gleason YOUNG meditatively Major over Jackson the field trudged of YOUNG meditatively over the ...
North And South War Strategies In Civil War Copy - camp.aws.org
North And South War Strategies In Civil War: Attack and Die Grady McWhiney,Perry D. Jamieson,1984-07-30 A Selection of the History Book Club A controversial book that answers why the Confederates suffered such staggering human losses History Book Club Review Strategies of North and South Gerald L. Earley,2021-06-30 Since the Antebellum days ...
Soldiers History and GeoGrapHy The Civil War - Core Knowledge
•he Civil War: the controversy over slavery, Harriet Tubman and the t Underground Railroad, Northern versus Southern states (Yankees and Rebels), Generals Ulysses S. Grant and Robert E. Lee, Clara Barton (“Angel ... confrontation over slavery between the North and South. INTRODUCTION 5
Tracking the Economic Divergence of the North and the South
1940s and 1950s, a number of Civil War historians sought to downplay differ ences between North and South by arguing that the war was repressible and tar geting one group in particular for blame: the "blundering generation" of politi cians holding office in the decades prior to the war. To these revisionists, political
Civil War Lesson Plan - Gettysburg College
2. Compare/contrast the goals and strategies of the Union and Confederacy. 3. Evaluate major events of the Civil War. Procedures: Students will create charts showing two columns (one for Union, one for Confederacy) and four rows. Each row will present a different topic: 1) War Aims/Goals 2) War Strategies 3) Strengths 4) Weaknesses
Oregon’s Civil War - Oregon Historical Society
histories treat the Civil War as a North-South conflict, distant from and irrelevant to the Pacific Northwest. Oregon’s status as a free state, its resi-dents’ (alleged) lack of interest in the slavery question, and its geographic distance from the war’s military action have long relegated Oregonians to the
The Readers’ South Literature, Region, and Identity in the Civil War E
566 journal of the civil war era, volume 8, issue 4 “intellectual independence” and Cole Hutchison’s work on Confederate literature confirm that this imagined distinctiveness mattered greatly to the Confederacy’s authors, publishers, and printers.11 The Civil War, of course, did precipitate the creation of new texts about region, war, and
AP United States History - AP Central
contributed to the divide between the North and the South and thus the outlook of the Civil War, the primary cause of the Civil War was the tension over slavery.” • “Throughout the mid-1800’s, debates rose on the institution of slavery which eventually led to the Civil War: social arguments were made such as whites were superior to
How Different from Each Other Were the Antebellum North and South…
4 Book-length discussions of the causes of the Civil War include Edwin C. Rozwenc, ed., The Causes of the American Civil War (Lexington, Mass., 1972); Thomas J. Pressly, Americans Interpret Their Civil War (Princeton, 1954); Howard K. Beale, What Historians Have Said about the Causes of the Civil War, Theory and Practice in His-
Civil War North And South Strategies (book)
Civil War North And South Strategies: Strategies of North and South Gerald L. Earley,2021-07-14 Since the Antebellum days there has been a tendency to ... Union and Confederate Civil War Strategies Martina Sprague,2013-03-25 The Civil War is an enormously important event
The Civil War - Claybaugh History
The Civil War 1861-1865 Was the Civil War worth its costs? Name:_____ Period:_____ Due:_____ I can identify the contribution of key individuals like Lincoln, Davis, Lee, and ... Strategies North South Characteristics North South Battle wins North South . Leaders of the War North South Number of States North South Population
North And South Strategies In The Civil War (book)
North And South Strategies In The Civil War: Strategies of North and South Gerald L. Earley,2021-06-30 Since the Antebellum days there has been a tendency to view the South as martially superior to the North In the years leading up to …
Civil War North And South Strategies (PDF)
Civil War North And South Strategies: Strategies of North and South Gerald L. Earley,2021-07-14 Since the Antebellum days there has been a tendency to ... Union and Confederate Civil War Strategies Martina Sprague,2013-03-25 The Civil War is an enormously important event
UNION JOINT OPERATIONS IN NORTH CAROLINA DURING THE CIVIL WAR …
2 Herman Hattaway and Archer Jones, How the North Won: A Military History of the Civil War (Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press, 1983), 12. 3 Howard M. Hensel, The Sword of the Union: Federal Objectives and Strategies During the American Civil War (Montgomery, Ala.: Air Command and Staff College, 1989), 8; Reed, 5.
North And South Strategies In The Civil War (Download Only)
North And South Strategies In The Civil War: Strategies of North and South Gerald L. Earley,2021-07-14 Since the Antebellum days there has been a tendency to view the South as martially superior to the North In the years leading up to …
North And South Strategies In The Civil War (PDF)
North And South Strategies In The Civil War: Strategies of North and South Gerald L. Earley,2021-06-30 Since the Antebellum days there has been a tendency to view the South as martially superior to the North In the years leading up to …
Locating the Civil Rights Movement: An Essay on the Deep South, …
3 Mar 2019 · Locating the Civil Rights Movement: An Essay on the Deep South, Midwest, and Border South in Black Freedom Studies Abstract Over the past few decades, scholars of the post-World War II civil rights movement have revisited key issues related to the goals , strategies , ideologies , participants, and periodization of black freedom struggles.
Civil War Signals - National Security Agency/Central Security …
Civil War Signals Ominous music and drum beat. ... field commanders on strategies, movements, and events on the field. President Lincoln spent ... the North and South using the same system, encryption was required to protect visual messages from being understood. Most often a cipher disk was used to encrypt the letters before they were
CIVIL WAR SESQUICENTENNIAL: Strategy, Tactics, and Fighting the Civil War
Civil War Book Review Spring 2013 Article 3 CIVIL WAR SESQUICENTENNIAL: Strategy, Tactics, and Fighting the Civil War Earl Hess Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.lsu.edu/cwbr Recommended Citation Hess, Earl (2013) "CIVIL WAR SESQUICENTENNIAL: Strategy, Tactics, and Fighting the Civil War," Civil War
War and Wealth: Economic Opportunity Before and After the Civil War …
economic history immediately following the Civil War decade. Between 1840 and 1860 the South improved its position relative to the North and the national average in terms of income per person.2 From 1860 to 1880, the South’s relative position deteriorated substantially and by 1900 it had still not recovered to its pre-Civil War position.3 The ...
North And South Strategies In The Civil War (Download Only)
North And South Strategies In The Civil War: Strategies of North and South Gerald L. Earley,2021-06-30 Since the Antebellum days there has been a tendency to view the South as martially superior to the North In the years leading up to …
Strategies Of North And South In Civil War - ftp.marmaranyc.com
more difficult path to victory and demonstrated superior strategy How the South Could Have Won the Civil War Bevin Alexander,2008-11-25 Could the South have won the Civil War To many the very question seems absurd After all the Confederacy had only a third of the population and one eleventh of the industry of the North Wasn t the South s defeat
The Home Front: North and South - Essential Civil War Curriculum
Life in the North During the Civil War. San Diego: Lucent Books, 1997. Catton, Bruce The American Heritage Picture History of the Civil War. Bonanza Books, 1982 ed., 2 vols. New York: Eaton Press, 1960, 1:393- ... Reger, James P. Life in the South During the Civil War. San Diego: Lucent Books, 1997.
Civil War Strategies Of North And South (book)
Civil War Strategies Of North And South: Strategies of North and South Gerald L. Earley,2021-06-30 Since the Antebellum days there has been a tendency to view the South as martially superior to the North In the years leading up to the Civil War Southern elites viewed Confederate
Illustrating War and Race: Political Cartoons and the Civil War
between the North and the South, and between black and white. The political cartoons of the Civil War era might provide us with valuable information into how cartoons can express the racism of society as well as the anger at that racism. They can allow us to criticize the way society works by poking fun at it and they also can
The Factory v. the Plantation: Northern and Southern Economies …
and the South that contributed to the Civil War To provide fresh primary resources and instructional approaches for use with students The Factory v. the Plantation . ... Given the industrial might of the North, did the South stand a chance of winning? americainclass.org 6 Peter Coclanis Director of the Global Research Institute
North And South Strategies In The Civil War (book)
North And South Strategies In The Civil War: Strategies of North and South Gerald L. Earley,2021-06-30 Since the Antebellum days there has been a tendency to view the South as martially superior to the North In the years leading up to …
Civil War Strategies Of North And South (Download Only)
Civil War Strategies Of North And South: Strategies of North and South Gerald L. Earley,2021-06-30 Since the Antebellum days there has been a tendency to view the South as martially superior to the North In the years leading up to the Civil War Southern elites viewed Confederate
SUDAN: FroM CoNFLICT To CoNFLICT - Amazon Web Services
escalated into war between North and South, with the South’s army crossing into the North and the North’s military bombing villages across the border. Oil exports from the South had been halted and other conflicts had broken out in both countries. Oil has long been one of the central drivers of conflict between the two Sudans.
THE VERY DIFFERENT BUT CONNECTED ECONOMIES OF THE …
Lysander Spooner, a fiery, abolitionist and anarchist, in writing about the Civil War wrote something that many of the South’s former slaveowners probably agreed with. According to Spooner, the North had managed to establish before the war and maintained afterwards the kind of relationship with the South that mercantilists
review essay - JSTOR
Beyond North and South Putting the West in the Civil War and Reconstruction stacey l. smith U.S. regional history owes its existence, in large part, to the study of the Civil War. Almost as soon as the Civil War ended, historians of the con-flict identified regionalism as a central framework for understanding U.S.
Neighbor against Neighbor: The Inner Civil War in the Randolph …
21 Jul 2017 · sity of California Press, 1955); Barrett, Civil War in North Carolina, 171-201; Carl N. Degler, The Other South: Southern Dissenters in the Nineteenth Century (New York: Harper and Row, 1974), hereinafter cited as Degler, The Other South; W. Buck Yearns and John G. Barrett (eds.), North Carolina Civil War Documentary (Chapel Hill: University of ...
Civil War Strategies Of North And South (Download Only)
Civil War Strategies Of North And South: Strategies of North and South Gerald L. Earley,2021-06-30 Since the Antebellum days there has been a tendency to view the South as martially superior to the North In the years leading up to the Civil War Southern elites viewed Confederate
North Strategies In The Civil War [PDF] - 58.camp.aws.org
North Strategies In The Civil War: Strategies of North and South Gerald L. Earley,2021-07-14 Since the Antebellum days there has been a tendency to view the South as martially superior to the North In the years leading up to the Civil War Southern elites viewed Confederate